Q: Why does it matter which law firm I choose for a wrongful death case?

Medical malpractice wrongful death cases require specialized knowledge, substantial resources, and the willingness to go up against well-funded hospital systems and insurance companies. At HBLG Law, we stay current on every development in Georgia wrongful death law — including rulings like Blasingame v. Cayamcela — so that we can build the strongest possible case for your family. Experience and preparation make a real difference in outcomes.

Question 1

Why does it matter which law firm I choose for a wrongful death case?

Accepted Answer

Medical malpractice wrongful death cases arise when a healthcare provider’s negligence causes a patient’s death. Common causes include:

Surgical errors
Failure to diagnose cancer or other serious conditions
Medication errors
Anesthesia mistakes
Hospital-acquired infections from negligent care
Failure to monitor or respond to deteriorating patient conditions

The families left behind — spouses, children, parents — are entitled to seek compensation not just for financial losses, but for the profound noneconomic harm of losing a loved one.

Question 2

How much does it cost to hire a wrongful death attorney in Georgia?

Accepted Answer

We handle wrongful death cases on a contingency fee basis, which means you pay nothing upfront and owe no attorney's fees unless we recover compensation for your family. You can focus on grieving and healing while we focus on fighting for the justice your family deserves.

Question 3

What are &#8220;noneconomic damages&#8221; in a wrongful death case?

Accepted Answer

Noneconomic damages are the non-financial losses that result from a loved one's death. In Georgia wrongful death cases, these can include:

Pain and suffering experienced by the deceased before death

Loss of consortium — the loss of companionship, love, and support suffered by a spouse

Loss of society and relationships suffered by surviving children or parents

Emotional distress of surviving family members

These damages are separate from economic damages like lost wages, medical bills, and funeral expenses, which are not subject to caps.

Question 4

Does this ruling mean damages caps are completely gone in Georgia medical malpractice cases?

Accepted Answer

Not entirely — but this ruling significantly weakens their enforceability. The Rockdale County Superior Court found Georgia Code Section 51-13-1 unenforceable on six independent grounds in this case. While this is a trial court ruling (not yet a Supreme Court decision), it is a powerful, well-reasoned order that defense attorneys will have difficulty overcoming. The legal trajectory in Georgia has been moving against damages caps since the Supreme Court's Nestlehutt decision in 2010, and this ruling continues that trend.

Question 5

Who are the victims in Georgia medical malpractice damages cap cases?

Accepted Answer

Medical malpractice wrongful death cases arise when a healthcare provider's negligence causes a patient's death. Common causes include:

Surgical errors

Failure to diagnose cancer or other serious conditions

Medication errors

Anesthesia mistakes

Hospital-acquired infections from negligent care

Failure to monitor or respond to deteriorating patient conditions

The families left behind — spouses, children, parents — are entitled to seek compensation not just for financial losses, but for the profound noneconomic harm of losing a loved one.

Question 6

How does Georgia&#8217;s damages cap ruling affect my wrongful death case?

Accepted Answer

This ruling is significant for Georgia families pursuing medical malpractice wrongful death claims for several reasons:

Higher potential verdicts. Without an enforceable cap, juries can award the full measure of noneconomic damages they believe is appropriate — unconstrained by an arbitrary statutory ceiling.

Defense tactics may be challenged. Defendants who try to invoke the cap late in litigation, as happened here, may find the argument waived.

The constitutional landscape continues to shift in favor of plaintiffs. Courts are increasingly unwilling to allow statutory caps to override jury determinations in medical malpractice cases.

Question 7

Why did the Georgia court refuse to apply the malpractice damages cap?

Accepted Answer

Waiver

The defendants waited until after the jury returned its verdict to raise the damages cap for the first time. The court found this was too late. By failing to identify Section 51-13-1 in the pre-trial order, defendants waived their right to invoke it. The plaintiffs had justifiably relied on the defendants' representations and were prejudiced — they could have presented different evidence and requested a different verdict form had the cap been timely raised.

Lesson for families: Defense lawyers sometimes try to spring the damages cap on plaintiffs after trial. An experienced wrongful death attorney will anticipate and counter these tactics.

The Entire Statute Fails — It Cannot Be Severed

The court held that the unconstitutional portions of Section 51-13-1 — specifically the caps on pain, suffering, and loss of consortium — are so intertwined with the rest of the statute that the entire law fails. The legislature chose a narrow severability clause that only allows courts to delete words, not rewrite statutes. The court could not surgically remove the unconstitutional portions without essentially rewriting the law — something courts are forbidden to do.

Separation of Powers

Applying the cap selectively — only to wrongful death damages but not to pain-and-suffering damages as Nestlehutt requires — would require the court to legislate from the bench. The General Assembly intended an across-the-board cap on all noneconomic damages. The court refused to transform that into a "wrongful death only" cap, recognizing that such a fundamental policy change belongs to the legislature, not the judiciary.

Right to Jury Trial

The court held that applying Section 51-13-1's caps to wrongful death noneconomic damages would violate Georgia's constitutional right to jury trial — and reached this conclusion using three different constitutional reference dates (1798, 1868, and 1983), independently and alternatively.

At each of those dates, medical malpractice claims existed in Georgia, juries decided them, and juries determined noneconomic damages. Capping those damages post-verdict substitutes the legislature's judgment for the jury's — precisely what Georgia's Constitution prohibits.

Equal Protection

The court found that applying the cap only to wrongful death noneconomic damages — but not to pain-and-suffering damages for patients who survived — creates an arbitrary and irrational distinction that violates equal protection under Georgia's Constitution.

The court illustrated this vividly: two patients suffer the same injury during surgery. One survives and can recover full noneconomic damages for loss of enjoyment of life. The other dies, and their family can recover only up to $350,000. The legislature never drew this distinction, and applying the cap this way has no rational relationship to the stated legislative purpose of promoting quality healthcare and predictability.

Set-Off Denied

The court also reaffirmed its earlier ruling that the defendants were not entitled to a set-off from prior settlements with former defendants — rejecting what the court called a "windfall" for the remaining defendants.

Question 8

What is Georgia&#8217;s non-economic damages cap in medical malpractice cases?

Accepted Answer

Georgia Code Section 51-13-1, enacted as part of Senate Bill 3 in 2005, placed a cap on noneconomic damages — things like pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of consortium — in medical malpractice cases. For years, insurance companies and healthcare defendants used this cap to limit what injured patients and grieving families could recover, regardless of how severe the harm or how egregious the negligence.

The cap had long been controversial. In Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery, P.C. v. Nestlehutt (2010), the Georgia Supreme Court struck down the cap as applied to pain-and-suffering damages, finding it violated the right to jury trial. The recent Turner decision from the Georgia Supreme Court left this holding undisturbed. The Rockdale court's July 2025 ruling builds powerfully on that foundation.

Your Case. Your Future.

Our Fight.

Malpractice Damages Cap FAQs